Prediction of Arthur De Greef vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. De Greef vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

Arthur De Greef

BEL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

145

113

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$140.2K

Career Money

$539.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

145

113

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$140.2K

Career Money

$539.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Greef 1 - 0 Wong

They have played 2 sets in total, with Arthur De Greef winning 2 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0. The last match between Arthur De Greef and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the M15 Hong Kong, 09-01-2020, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Arthur De Greef getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Greef	1
Wong	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) M15 Hong Kong(01-09-20)

Stats

Arthur De Greef

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

A. D. Greef vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile

A. D. Greef	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
$140,200	Career Prize Money	$538,970
59.71% (372-251)	Career Total W/L	55.78% (164-130)
1	Hard	0
12	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	45.45% (5-6)

A. D. Greef vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Arthur De Greef has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 47.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Arthur De Greef, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 44.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 22.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Arthur De Greef has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 52.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Arthur De Greef has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 52.24% (W/L 35/32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Arthur De Greef has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 318/190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/3). Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8).
Player level: In the last year, Arthur De Greef has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.10% of matches (W/L 23/18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Arthur De Greef winning 1 times and Chak Lam Coleman Wong being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Arthur De Greef winning 2 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0.
The last match between Arthur De Greef and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the M15 Hong Kong, 09-01-2020, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Arthur De Greef getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Arthur De Greef has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against players with an average rank of 205.58.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Arthur De Greef has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Arthur De Greef has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Arthur De Greef vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. D. Greef vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. D. Greef	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
6	Aces (Total)	5
1	Total Double Faults	3
1:19:0	Average Match Time	1:19:0
63% (37/59)	1st Serve %	64% (37/58)
76% (28/37)	1st Serve Win %	78% (29/37)
64% (14/22)	2nd Serve Win %	33% (7/21)
40% (2/5)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/0)
38% (22/58)	Return Points Win %	29% (17/59)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. D. Greef Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open Qualifying - Doha - 11-01-2021
Q1 Mohamed SafwatM. Safwat	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Alicante Challenger - 12-10-2020
Q3 Malek JaziriM. Jaziri	L	6-0 6-3	Stats
Q1 Vit KoprivaV. Kopriva	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
M25 Pardubice - 28-09-2020
R1 Petr NouzaP. Nouza	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
French Open - Paris - 28-09-2020
Q1 Tommy RobredoT. Robredo	L	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

A. D. Greef vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. D. Greef	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
59.71% (372/251)	YTD Win/Loss	55.78% (164/130)
58.07% (824/595)	Sets Win/Loss	54.07% (372/316)
52.65% (7022/6316)	Games Win/Loss	51.16% (3419/3264)
50.94% (27/26)	Hard Win/Loss	58.90% (129/90)
62.60% (318/190)	Clay Win/Loss	46.51% (20/23)
44.83% (26/32)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (9/9)
25.00% (1/3)	Grass Win/Loss	42.86% (6/8)
0.17	Aces Per Game	0.52
1099	Aces Total	1687
0.14	Double Faults Per Game	0.18
904	Total Double Faults	603
1st Match	Average Match Time	1:31:40
620.87	Average Opponent Rank	366.8
58% (14002/24035)	1st Serve %	60% (11331/18739)
67% (9397/14002)	1st Serve Win %	71% (8054/11331)
49% (4913/10033)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (3631/7408)
42% (1047/2493)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (703/1718)
41% (9746/23974)	Return Points Win %	38% (7230/18830)
34.78% (8/15)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
0% (0/0)	Masters W/L	46.67% (7/8)
0.00% (0/2)	Cups W/L	62.50% (5/3)
55.00% (11/9)	Main Tour W/L	27.27% (3/8)
52.16% (145/133)	Challenger W/L	55.65% (69/55)
69.33% (208/92)	Futures W/L	59.50% (72/49)
60% (358/595)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (157/286)
43% (3/7)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	83% (5/6)
59% (110/187)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	55% (56/102)
52% (96/185)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (51/94)
87% (365/319)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (157/136)
13% (365/46)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (157/21)
20% (258/52)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (137/27)